COBie Requirement Review
Review supplied project templates, required fields, data rules and handover expectations.
Structure project and asset information for digital handover using defined COBie or client-specific information requirements — connecting facilities, floors, spaces, equipment, asset types, systems, attributes, documents and other required operational data.
Facility teams may receive drawings, models, schedules, manuals, submittals and equipment records from multiple sources.
COBie-style structured handover organizes selected building and asset information so that key data can be transferred in a more controlled and reviewable format.
The exact data structure and acceptance criteria should always follow the actual project requirements, owner requirements, templates and contractual deliverables.
The data scope can be aligned with supplied owner information requirements, project templates, BIM execution requirements and agreed facility-handover deliverables.
Review supplied project templates, required fields, data rules and handover expectations.
Structure project-defined facility, space, asset and equipment information.
Connect selected model information with required handover data fields.
Organize project-defined equipment, component and asset information for handover.
Structure building, floor, space and project-defined zone information.
Organize project-defined equipment relationships around required facility systems.
Structure references to supplied O&M manuals, warranties, submittals and related records.
Review required fields, duplicates, references, formats and project-defined rules.
Prepare agreed datasets, models and supporting information for final handover.
Exact worksheets, columns, mandatory fields and project rules should follow the supplied project requirement.
Every required cell can appear populated while asset IDs, locations, classifications, document references or model relationships remain incorrect.
Handover QA should therefore review the meaning and relationship of the information — not only whether a field contains text.
Review required fields, templates, data rules and project deliverables.
Gather BIM, schedules, asset registers, submittals and closeout records.
Map source information to required handover fields.
Populate agreed facility, space, asset and system information.
Review required values, references, duplicates and relationships.
Prepare the agreed handover dataset and supporting files.
When asset information exists both in BIM and in structured handover data, the relationships should be controlled.
Equipment names, asset IDs, spaces, systems and required parameters should be reviewed so that the digital handover does not describe a different condition from the final project record.
Structured handover data can affect downstream facility workflows, so project-defined information should be reviewed before issue.
QA can include required fields, identifiers, type relationships, spaces, systems, document references, duplicate records, source consistency and model alignment.
MEP Global Engineering can support COBie data preparation, BIM-to-data mapping, asset information, data cleanup, validation and structured digital handover.
Final compliance depends on the exact project specification, owner information requirements, contractual requirements, required COBie version, templates, classifications, mandatory fields, validation rules and formal acceptance process.
Missing source data, equipment information, approved product records or stakeholder inputs cannot be reliably replaced by unsupported assumptions.
COBie is a structured approach for organizing selected building, space, asset and operational information for project handover and downstream use. The exact required format and data should follow the project's specified requirements.
Yes. Suitable BIM information can contribute to COBie or structured handover data, particularly where model objects contain reliable project-defined parameters.
Depending on project requirements, sources can include equipment schedules, asset registers, space schedules, approved submittals, O&M manuals, commissioning records and other closeout information.
Yes. Existing datasets can be reviewed for missing required fields, duplicate records, inconsistent identifiers, relationship issues and other project-defined validation rules.
Yes. Where model structure and project identifiers permit, selected handover records can be aligned with corresponding BIM assets.
No. Compliance depends on the actual contract, information requirements, template, data rules, classification requirements, mandatory fields, validation process and final acceptance criteria. The dataset should therefore be reviewed against the specific project requirement.
Share your COBie template, owner requirements, BIM models, asset registers, equipment schedules and closeout documentation.